The Back Door of The Dark Enlightenment
Mar. 4th, 2012 | 12:13 pm
mood:
thoughtful
With that said, here's some of a list I compiled a couple of years ago. When I dug it out of the mothballs of cyberspace, I was somewhat surprised to find that not much has changed in those 2 years, so... "awakening" does appear to be a state-of-mind/being that, once achieved, doesn't change very much, other than to expand from its own foundation.
1. I walk through life now looking more at the scenery than the inhabitants - i.e., on long drives I am focused on the mountains, the weather, thoughts of the infinite, which leads to...
2. The human world has lost all meaning, if it ever had any.
3. There is nothing I truly long to do with regard to humanform activities. I have no desire to travel (because all destinations are within myself, therefore no real reason to leave home). I have no interest in writing the Great American Novel (so it stands to reason I'm a better writer now than pre-enlightenment, but now I have nothing I want or need to communicate...) The cornerstone of enlightenment is irony.
4. All "causes" have lost all meaning, with the exception of what I do personally & individually. I would rescue a lost kitten if it crossed my path, for example, but I would not go out and join "causes" as I might have done in the past.
5. I used to think I could "get through to people" if only I could explain myself better. This was a demon w/ my MIL in particular, and a few former forum members. LOL. Now, I no longer care if they "get me" or not.
6. There is a sense of isolation even when in the company of those closest to me, particularly as I watch them move further and further from "enlightenment", moving deeper and deeper into "the agreement". I find myself torn between wanting to pull them back onto the path, yet knowing that anything I say might as well be said to ghosts, to an idea, a fictional character. The world at large cannot hear me, for I am the ghost.
7. I marvel at the ignorance of humans. Particularly as it relates to religion. They are content to believe in God(s), but take no interest in matters of their own spirit.
8. Prior to enlightenment, I always "believed" it would result in a state of well-being and a perpetual smile. Not so. I am still the same person, just more disconnected from the hive. No perpetual bliss, no eternal torment. Just... a different manner of looking at the world through the same eyes. Clarity without any great need to "fix" anything.
9. Nothing really matters, but everything is significant.
10. The flaw in the human program is that the program itself is utterly flawed. This especially pertains to mortality - by the time we are old enough or smart enough to receive "enlightenment", we are closer to the end than to the beginning.
11. If life has any meaning, it is the manifestation of spiritual evolution. What does that mean? I *see* it as a permanent shift of the AP to what might be an inorganic state of infinite awareness. Jury's still out. Ergo, at present, life has no profound meaning other than existence itself.
_________________
I'm sure there are other observations could make, but... see #2 above.



Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Share
Belief vs. Knowledge in UFO Investigation
Dec. 17th, 2011 | 11:11 am
mood:
amused

Go figure! And here I thought the fundies were too busy bombing abortion clinics and persecuting gays to get involved in the "simple" subject of UFOs. Learn something new every day, I guess. After reading several of these articles which proclaim as if it is a fact that "UFOs are demons sent by Satan" or "My guardian angel drives a UFO"... I began to realize that the metaphysical & spiritual studies I've been engaged in for the past - oh - 56 years (yes, that IS my entire life) are not nearly as fruitloop whackadoodle as some might want to believe, and might actually be able to shed some light on these absurd belief systems which permeate the minds of so many.
So I wrote an article. Or two. Maybe three at this point. Who's counting?
WARNING: If you are a fundamentalist Christian or other hard core "true believer", read no further. My entire commentary here is designed to shed rational and reasonable doubt on your "faith". So, with that said, proceed at your own risk.
_____________________
Posted to UFO Digest, December 15, 2011
The problem with arguments based solely on Biblical texts (or any other quasi-religious text) is that the argument itself is almost invariably rooted within an existing belief system that has nothing to do with the subject at hand. From a Biblical standpoint, for example, UFOs are usually categorized as being of the demonic or the angelic realm, and the reader is essentially being asked to choose sides. If you're not FOR the angels, then you MUST be for the demons, and vice versa. This sets up a dualistic model which assumes the reader automatically agrees with the paradigm in which the article is written. In other words, the reader isn't being encouraged to THINK, but only asked to BELIEVE. And there is no "right" answer at that point - rather like... "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?"
On my own website, I often get religious believers wanting to debate me on one subject or another. And what always seems to happen is that when common sense or logic is invoked, suddenly I am accused of attacking the person or trying to "steal their faith". I always have to laugh at that, because religion is the greatest theft of common sense, logic, and personal power that has ever existed. When someone makes the decision to look at the world solely through the eyes of their religion, they have abdicated their own power and turned it over to "the church", and in doing so, the church has become the very devil it preaches against. "Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain." Just accept on our word that everything is under control (and put that hundred dollar bill in the collection plate so we can keep telling you what to think, what to believe, how to live, who to hate. Any questions? Don't ask. Questions are of the devil.)
Question everything. Question reality. Question authority. But most of all, stop at least once a day and question your own beliefs. Do you believe God exists? If so, WHY do you believe it? Is it something you read in a book? Is it something someone told you? Really ask yourself: WHY do you believe something? Do you believe UFOs come from outer space? Inner space? What do you believe...? Why do you believe it...? This kind of questioning may seem on the surface to be annoying but it is the ONLY way we may be able to confront the fact that MOST of what we believe has nothing to do with reality itself. Man once believed the earth was flat and resided at the center of the universe, remember?
My own work focuses on the relationship between the mortal self and what might be called "the immortal Other" - the aspect of our being that is commonly called the higher self, the totality of oneself, or a variety of other names. And in the grand scheme of things, I have come to wonder if "they" (UFOs, aliens, faieries, and other mythical beings) are actually US - the part of ourselves that we project beyond this world so that we can explore other possibilities which would otherwise be unattainable to us due to the limitations of mortality itself. So if "they" are "us", where does that leave "us" and "them"?

What I've learned with regard to the UFO dilemma and most other mysteries, is that we need to look at them for what they ARE, examine them as truly awe-insping mysteries, rather than trying to assign easy conclusions and meaning to these incidents, because all too often, the incident itself might NOT be willing to fall in line with our human conclusions and meanings, at which point we run the high risk of finding ourselves at odds with the thing itself, and setting up an adversarial position, wherein we say UFOs are "evil" because they didn't agree to agree with our conclusions.
Finally, because the UFO mystery remains a mystery and a controversy, attempting to shove it into a Biblical context is not only pointless, but ultimately self-limiting. If we already BELIEVE UFOs are "of god" or "of the devil", then we cannot see it in any other light than what our pre-existing belief dictates. The moment we do that, we have abandoned all hope of Knowledge and entered into a pact with blind faith and superstitious belief. Might as well believe the Easter Bunny is at the helm and Santa Claus is driving the saucer-shaped sleigh at that point.
The destruction of faith is the beginning of evolution.
Thanks for listening,
Della Van Hise
http://www.quantumshaman.com
___________
Perhaps not surprisingly, I received a good supply of hate mail from angry xtians - which is rather amusing in itself. Angry Christians. Shouldn't that be a contradiction in terms? But, of course, it is the norm and not the exception, but I digress...
What follows is a dialog that ensued between myself and the angry mob (designated herein as "AM"). AM's comments in plain text, mine in bold, designated as "QS" (Quantum Shaman).
________________
AM: Very interesting article. Although I am one of those people who believes a minority of UFOs do have a spiritual dimension to them. And some close encounters do exhibit almost spiritual characteristics, appearing and disappearing at will, doing speeds that defy the laws of physics, not to mention those who have had the misfortune to come into contact with those supposedly piloting these craft, who have reported the smell of sulphur and an intent to harm.
QS: The smell of sulphur. Interesting that this is automatically associated with Biblical references to hell. The reality of it is actually very scientific. Sulphur can be used as a fuel or for other purposes. It is nothing more than a chemical compound with many beneficial uses. The fact that christianity has CREATED an association (a program) between the smell of sulphur and evil... has nothing to do with sulphur itself. I personally associate the smell of oranges with an idyllic childhood, but that doesn't mean anyone else must AUTOMATICALLY share the same associations. Sulphur, alas, is just sulphur.
As for crafts doing inexplicable maneuvers, there's also nothing strange or even "spiritual" about that. If the occupants have mastered the quantum universe, they will be using a form of physics that humans on Earth simply cannot (yet) wrap their minds around. You see it as spiritual. I see it as advanced science. As Arthur C. Clarke once said: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
AM: A person who believes in the Bible does not necessarily think that every unexplainable phenomenon must be of spiritual origin. But we think rationally. What sort of power source would be required to send a ship hundreds of light years across the galaxy? Assuming light speed is attainable, how long would such a journey take?
QS: You may be limiting yourself by thinking in terms of a Newtonian-based physics, when in all probability, craft from other worlds will be using some manner of "quantum" propulsion - thereby bending space and time to suit their needs. "Time" becomes irrelevant, and space that was perceived as a vast distance from a Newtonian perspective is virtually non-existent when one possesses the knowledge/technology to "warp" space.
AM: Why would an alien civilization send a probe or a craft billions of light years to even the nearest planet, only to hover around and then disappear again just as quickly? Why no contact? And why are the only ones who claim to have been contacted by aliens the people who are already involved in the occult? And why do these beings, when contact is supposedly made, always bring a "new age" message?
QS: Has it occurred to you that you might be asking the wrong question? When you ask "why", you are automatically attempting to put humanform "logic" onto what might very well be an altogether alien civilization. For all we really know, contact HAS occurred. Maybe it hasn't happened to you or to me, but who's to say it hasn't happened to someone else? When you say that the only ones who claim to have been contacted are those already involved in the occult... well... no offense, but that's absurd. And, for that matter, by strict definition, ANY religion is "the occult" - including Christianity. Think about it. It is based on the fanciful notion that a virgin was impregnated by a ghost and gave birth to a demi-god. If that isn't straight out of Greek mythology, what is?
My point is simply that your own belief systems are not AUTOMATICALLY "right" and all else automatically "wrong". If you're going to be even remotely objective, Christianity, Wicca, Buddhism, Taoism, Shintoism, and all the other "isms" are largely cultural belief systems, and each and every one of them is rooted in "the occult" - because by definition, "the occult" is that which cannot be explained by rational, logical terms. Man created religion to comfort himself - not the other way around. God doesn't need us to worship him. But many humans seem to need God, and so religion allows for a collective belief system wherein all those with that need can get together and say they all "feel" or "believe" the same thing. Ultimately, it's nothing more than a collaborative comfort zone.
AM: There is deception in the world. The theory of evolution, the new age movement, the occult and ufology are all linked.
QS: Evolution is not a theory. While some may argue that there is no proof that man evolved from apes, the idea of evolution itself has been proven time and again. Species adapt and change in accordance with their environment. If they didn't, we'd ALL be extinct. That's hardly new age or occult. I think you are just looking for "evil" or trying to find a comfort zone for your own beliefs. That's okay. But when you overlook scientific reality in favor of YOUR occult religious beliefs (christianity), then you are no less guilty than those you are accusing of doing that very thing. So to say evolution, new age and the occult and ufology are all linked... that's just your belief system giving you feedback which you have programmed it to give to you. Think about it.
AM: The "aliens" always bring a new age message, never a Christian one.
QS: Has it ever occurred to you to ask yourself why that might be? Maybe - just maybe - all of Christianity is a fairy tale that is localized here on Earth. I've always said that if I went to Zeta Reticuli IX and found a civilization that worshipped a man named Jesus, I MIGHT consider giving christianity another look. But all evidence is actually AGAINST finding the same mythology on another world, so it stands to reason the "aliens" aren't bringing Christian messages. They also aren't bringing Buddhist or Hindu or Taoist messages as far as I know. So... I wouldn't take it personally if I were you. Maybe the aliens just think for themselves and the "messages" they are delivering are HUMAN messages that can be accepted or rejected by humans - not based on the human's pre-existing religious beliefs, but based on an intrinsic connection to spirit (which does not belong exclusively to any religion, but to all living things).
AM: Why do I believe God exists? Bible prophecy proves it. Look at Israel. God said in the Bible He would bring His people back to the land. And they are back.
QS: Bible prophecy also talks about a lot of things that never happened. The bible also suggests that we should kill all homosexuals and forbid women from having a voice. So, that being the case, I tend to take the bible (and all other religious texts) with a large grain of salt.
AM: I think it's good to ask questions, don't get me wrong. But I think the Bible has the answers you are looking for.
QS: Having read the bible many times as a child and a young adult, I'd have to say that the Bible may have YOUR answers. It does not have mine. That's okay - you are free to believe whatever brings you comfort. I've never been one for ignoring the question because I'm afraid of the answer. My mother once told me, "Don't go looking for God unless you're willing to accept that you might not find him." In other words - some people are comfortable just BELIEVING what they have read or what their pastor tells them, or what they read in books. I'm not one of those people. I've searched for "God", and it always leads me right back to the mirror. God is in all of us. What we DO with that is what determines what we find looking back at us in our own reflection - aliens, demons, angels, gods... or simply the human potential.
Thou Art God: Create Yourself Accordingly
(Or at the very least, think for yourself and stop believing every little thing you hear...)
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Share
The Medical Profession - Wankers & Bozos!
Oct. 25th, 2010 | 01:56 pm
Is it just me, or is the medical profession comprised of the biggest bunch of bozos and wankers ever to come down the sewer pipes? Went to the doc a few weeks ago 'cuz I was having chest pains - probably related to my back, also probably related to the stress (what? me? stress?) that accompanies running one's own business in an economy that has been programmed to decline and continue to decline even when there is (and I quote) "not much logical reason for the continuing deterioration." But no matter... The world is a nuthouse and the lunatics are running the asylum, so... nothing new there.
Chest pains, I say. So the doc stares at me for awhile, doesn't even offer to listen to my heart to see if I'm dead or alive, then starts writing prescriptions for the most expensive drugs on the market without so much as a by-your-leave. "You are a diabetic," he reminds me in his thick accent, as if that should explain so much for so many at a time when it seems to me that "diabetes" is the fad diagnosis of the 21st century in the same way ADHA and MPD were the fad diagnoses of the '90s. Put another way: he is telling me to behave like the label he has stuck to my ass, and gets uppity when I remind him that I am neither a label nor a dis-ease. I am a person with a name and a life partner and a cat and a dog. I am not just a "diabetic" - and with good reason - for once we become labeled by our handlers (doctors, lawyers and charlatans of all walks of life), we become to them nothing more than the label itself. And let's face it, folks. Diabetes is the cash cow of the decade! Walk into any Walmart or Rite-Aid or the like, and you will find not just a small shelf of diabetis supplies, but an entire aisle consisting of a cornucopia of products designed to put a smile on any CEO's face. So keep in mind that when your doctor tells you you're a diabetic, what he's REALLY seeing is not your potential well-being or lack thereof, but a long line of checks in the form of kickbacks from the pharmaceutical companies - who KNOWINGLY market products which have more side-effects than potential benefits. Any doubt, do your own research. I did - and I was appalled!
Maybe it stands to reason that when I came out of a store yesterday and glanced at the newspaper racks, there was a glaring headline which read something like, "Diabetes expected to triple by the year 2050 - 1 in 3 will have the disease!" Be afraid! Be very afraid! Run to the priests of the scalpel and ask your doctor about all those yummie drugs that are just as likely to kill you as to cure you. Wear this label! Act out your dis-ease! Be a good patient! Play your role!
Role. You're in a play, you know. We all are. Yes, including your doctor, who probably knows a lot less about your body than you do. A few months ago, one doc tried to schedule me for a prostate exam. ??? That could get interesting.
Here's the thing, folks. And this is NOT the exception to the rule near as I can tell. In 2004, my mother had 2 colonoscopies, both of which returned "normal" results. She died in 2006 of colon cancer, which had been present "for years" according to the medical examiner's final report. In 2008, my ex-husband was diagnosed with scabies (bugs, to the uninformed), and subsequently treated with expensive skin care products. The reality? His gall bladder was enlarged to twice its size, and gall stones had turn up the bile duct - NONE of which showed up on MRIs, blood tests, or the like. By the time he got a correct diagnosis and had the gallbladder removed, he had suffered severe damage of the bile duct, lost over 80 pounds, and was wandering around town in a confused state because of the resulting toxins which had built up in his system. Several years ago, a good friend went to the emergency room complaining of abdominal pain so severe she couldn't stand and could barely breathe. She was told to go home and take a laxative and an enema. She died a week later of peritonitis, caused when her impacted bowels ruptured.
Need I continue?
Why on Earth or any other civilized planet do we trust these clowns, when it is proven time and time again that they kill more people than they cure? Enough already! I go in with chest pains, and the doc gives me a prescription for pain pills and muscle relaxants! About 18 years ago, when I went in with a large lump in my breast, I was told by the first quack, "I'd recommend ignoring it for awhile and see if it goes away." Arugh! What?
The bottom line is that WE give these gonzos the power of life and death over our bodies - and it's high time we stopped just buying into their sweet-scented bullshit. So today as I was sitting in the waiting room of the lab - for over 2 hours, I might add - I found myself looking at the downtrodden, frightened people waiting to be told whether they would live or die, whether they would be asked to play the role of a Diabetic or a Heart Patient or a Cancer Victim.
Maybe it's all just a crap shoot. Society tells ue we will die of something, yet this is the same society that once told us the earth was flat, and at the center of the universe. So maybe it's time we stopped buying into the programs, turn off the idiot box that keeps trying to sell us on this or that drug and encouraing us to "Ask your doctor about mycoxafloppin..." and go back to living the way nature intended:
Eat well.
Run when the lion comes out of the jungle.
Love unconditionally.
Get fucked often (and NOT by the medical profession!)
Take back your power.
Link | Leave a comment {4} | Add to Memories | Share
The Road Home
Jun. 16th, 2010 | 01:07 am
The mountains themselves were capped with a heavy snowpack which had begun to melt rapidly due to the warmer temperatures of the past several days. As a result, the Walker River, which had flowed at a normal pace on the journey up, was now swelled to almost capacity, and was rushing wildly through the unparalleled beauty of the forest. Ah, but what no one else seemed to notice was that some of the whitecaps were wraiths, some of their faces twisted into watery grimaces, others blank as if possessing no awareness whatsoever. Faces in the water. Men. Women. Children. Forever caught in some macabre recreation of their deaths, I presumed. Ghosts of the river. Spirits of the water. Tumbling and pitching, but always with their faces pointed in the direction of the flow, to the north or the east, depending on the bend of the river... disappearing in shafts of sunlight, becoming visible again as the bank of the river bent underneath the shade of the tall pines. "Going nowhere forever," the voice of silent knowing whispered. "Caught in the finality of their own final moments, awareness trapped in the energetic fabric of the milieu itself, like a photograph embedded on the fabric of time."
But all too soon the river was gone, left behind as we continued along the lonesome road. A dead deer alongside the road stared upward, its lifeless brown eye reflecting the sky and the clouds, eternity caught in a mirror from which all awareness had departed. I wanted to weep, yet what would have been the point. So I smiled to myself instead. appreciating for a moment whatever life the young deer had lived. Brief, but hopefully sweet. Perhaps some fresh spring grass still in his mouth to go with the clouds in his eyes. That would be nice, though I rather doubt his last moments on Earth were in any way pleasant.
Further along the highway, a dragon lay sleeping in an open meadow. Yes, a real dragon. Or so it seemed. Perhaps 50 feet long, with golden wings and a scaly brown body. Sharply pointed ears, and a lovely tail that curled around the muscular hind legs, just so. Since Wendy was driving and didn't see it, I chose to keep it to myself, making no comment. No point arguing the "reality" of dragons, for then perhaps it would have become just another odd rock formation, just an array of sharp boulders with orange flowers growing nearby to give the illusion of wings. At that moment, I did not want the illusion shattered, so I simply let it go right on being a dragon. He winked as I made the decision, and it was a silence we shared out there in the nothing. Just me and the beastie. No consensus. No agreement. No argument. Dragons are good gentles, he told me in some universal language. Keep down the human hunters and escort the souls of road-slain deer to the Otherworld in their spare time. Yes, I decided dragons are much maligned, so I said nothing of his presence. And then he, too, was gone, just another odd memory from an odd journey down an odd road somewhere at the edge of time.
Further along, near the river but not close enough to see it, a run-down trailer park looking like something out of a Stephen King novel nestled up under the trees, and four little boys ranging in age from perhaps 3-8 had stripped down to their boxers and were spraying one another with the hose. The sight was incongruous but somehow perfectly preserved like a faded photograph in an old family album. As I watched, the boys grew up, exchanged their Buster Browns for business suits, one spending too much time in jail, one becoming a successful businessman, the other two living more or less uneventful lives... then in the rearview mirror, just old men sitting in front of an abandoned trailer somewhere in the dark forest at the edge of the River Lethe. Time chewed them up, spit them back out. They never saw it coming, never felt the cold brush of death until it was upon them, never stopped to wonder what might have been different had they turned left instead of right.
It wasn't a matter of judging them, just a matter of observing what was - not just in those 4 little boys with so much potential, but in the world at large. Live the programs long enough, buy into the dictates of the foreign installation too long... and life is over before it ever begins. Yesterday we were children, the voice of silent knowing reminded. Today we are warriors. And tomorrow we will die.
What we do in the interim determines our fate.
By the time we arrived home, the sun was low on the horizon, and descending into Yucca Valley was like a homecoming that was comfortrable and yet all too disturbing. The Joshua trees were dropping their seed pods, struggling to recreate themselves. Ravens perched atop the tall telephone poles, their mouths open to shed off the approach of summer, the desert heat. Standing in the driveway after Wendy had gone inside, the world was bright with all manner of bloom: acacia tree, oleander, ocotillo, and at least 4 different colors of cactus. Life asserting itself, dancing its colorful dance... then all too quickily losing its blossoms to the unrelenting wind.
The moon was barely a sliver, a faint whisper. Venus or Jupiter dangled from the crescent like a crystal reflecting the sun.
The crack between the worlds stood open in a way I had never quite seen it before. Like a doorway from one world to another, yet both worlds were the same world except in how they are perceived. Life. Death. Breath and awareness being the only dividing line.
I breathed. An exchange of energy between the observer and the observed.
The road is behind me now. And still and always ahead.
All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights
Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Share
"It's done in dreaming."
May. 5th, 2010 | 08:40 am
There are some who would say the I-Am survives regardless of the process of living and dying, but if that were the case, I rather doubt we would be imbued with the instinct to continue. One more breath. One more sunset. One more sunrise. Yes. To go on living. The physicality of it really isn't the issue. The perception of it all is.
What does this have to do with dreaming? Simply this. Over the weekend, as I was sitting in the motorhome looking out over a magnificent park under the light of a waning moon, I was filled with the thought that it's all so transient. Over the years as we've visited that same park, massive oaks have grown to maturity, died, and been replaced with young saplings. The huge stone picnic tables are taken on chips and nicks. The gopher who lives underneath the ground where our merchant booth is located has had babies several times. In all likelihood, she is long dead and her babies are having babies now.
Transient.
Given enough time, even the mountains will disappear, whittled to gravel by the immortal wind. Earth. Air. Fire. Water. Spirit. The five elements of creation. The five Immortals. And each one a part of us in some manner. We are made of eternity, yet we perceive ourselves as transients. Odd, that.
So as I sat there in the darkness pondering these things, I thought again of the concept of transmogrification - the transference/transcendence of our awareness from our humanform body into our dreaming body. Almost without consciously directing it, I heard myself ask Orlando, "Okay, what does it look like? How is it done? What is the procedure which would bring this state of being into Be-ing?"
His answer was immediate and succinct. "It's done in dreaming."
For the next two hours, a dialogue ensued which focused mainly on the feel of this type of dreaming. It's not a technique we might master. To think so would only be the height of ego, the grandstanding of pure ego. It's not some clever manipulation of energy dependent on some bit of yada we read in a book somewhere. It's not even a case of lucidity in dreaming.
These things Orlando explained first - because the bottom line with us humans is that we are so steeped in our programs (yes, even and especially our "warrior" programs) that we can't feel the forest because we're too busy trying to *see* the trees.
"In dreaming," Orlando explained as a large owl perched in the tree just above the motorhome and sang her lonesome song, "the mind doesn't question what just is. It simply does the impossible and accepts it as ordinary, and in doing so a new reality is created wherein actions such as flying or reading with your eyes closed or breathing underwater are merely aspects of your inventory, other abilities you may possess when your mind can allow it."
I thought about that for a long time that night, realizing that it would also include this seemingly mysterious act of transmogrification - which I personally believe is what the Tenant accomplished. If the myths are true (a big if, of course), s/he lives a relatively normal human life, with the grand exception that s/he is immortal, can apparently take any form/gender, and experiences a seamless awareness spanning centuries into the past, and who nows how far into the future? A being who was once a transient organic, transformed by will (dreaming?) into an inorganic awareness.
After being on this path for so many years (a lifetime, actually), I have observed that no matter how impeccable we may be in our ordinary tonal lives, we are nonetheless affected by the humanform programs (which may well be hardwired into the DNA at some level), so whenever we are in waking awareness, there are things we simply cannot do which we would do easily in dreaming. Let's just talk about flying for a moment. In dreaming, we lift our feet off the ground, experience a profound moment of awe/ecstasy, and wonder how the hell we forgot how to do that. Maybe the experience propels us into lucidity, maybe not. But in dreaming, we accept without question that we can fly, whereas that really doesn't appear to be possible in ordinary awareness. Oh, someone is sure to say that monks in dank monasteries may levitate or float a coconut for the amusement of curious bystanders, but when that same monk goes soaring over London or Toronto, I do hope someone with a cell phone cam will snap a pic and post it on this forum... because even if "levitation" may be a reality, it's a far cry from what we can do in Dreaming.
So... of course the question turns to this. Even if we CAN fly in our dreams, we don't seem to be able to bring that ability into our waking awareness. So how would achieving the state of transmogrification be any different? Well, that's a work in progress. My sense of it as I sat there looking out over that magickal park in the middle of the night was that the act of transferring our awareness into our dreaming body would quite likely transcend ALL levels of awareness. Put another way, we would wake up inside the dreaming body and life would continue as before (or not) depending entirely on the intent/will of the warrior/seeker.
Ah well. As I said... a work in progress. Some stray thoughts on a magnificent morning while the quail are talking quietly among themselves at the pond, the weenie dog is sleeping in my lap, and the cat is preening in the window.
All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Share
Believe No Thing
Apr. 10th, 2010 | 02:07 pm
I had originally thought to simply walk away from this phase of my life - what I might call "The Internet Toltec Years" - but after considerable private deliberation, multiple conversations with Mel, Fox, Dan, Wendy, Crystal, Vicky W. and others, combined with input from Orlando... I find myself compelled to say a few words about absolutely nothing of importance, but nonetheless stuff that needs to be laid to rest, for myself if nothing else. If this posts makes no sense to you, then it is not meant for you. If it angers you or strokes that raw nerve you've been cultivating for just such occasions, best ask yourself why.
I will start with this: it was spring of 2000 when I first began putting my website together. It was at the urging of Orlando and one of my mentors that I initially decided to launch the site and, subsequently, my first forum. I was told by Orlando at the time, "You will do this for 5 years with great enthusiasm, and for another 5 years with less than great enthusiasm, but it is important that you complete the task." It was also made clear to me that the next 10 years would result in the loss of longstanding "friendships", the turning upside down of my personal life, and essentially the rearranging of everything I had ever held to be true. I must confess I didn't really believe the warnings at the time - but they have turned out to be accurate, and to a far greater extent than I ever could have imagined.
Over the years, when I would question Orlando about this task, he would consistently give two somewhat different but related answers. 1) "The task is for your own assimilation - it is how you will formulate and test your foundation." And 2) "You will meet people from whom you will learn, and people whom you will teach."
Personally, I think that's true for all of us, and I've learned a great deal from the past 10 years of being involved in the Toltec community. And yet, I never wanted to be anyone's teacher - largely because it's obvious to me that most people already think they know everything, and will fight to the death to prove it. Perpetual teenagers, IOW. There's a reason I never had kids - never wanted the headache of trying to raise them. LOL. They will rationalize and attempt to justify their belief systems by making up new rules as they go along. "We are already Buddhas." That's always good for a laugh. Somehow, I don't think Buddha became Buddha by sitting in a chatroom. He did the work. Imagine that! Another good one I've heard repeatedly is, "There's no such thing as enlightenment." (Of course not - state your limitation and you own it.) And the old standby... "It's all good."
Is it? Really? Or is that just the rhetoric one feeds oneself to avoid the necessity of doing anything that might involve walking away from the computer, turning off the television, stopping the internal dialog that's patting you on the back for your latest clever sarcasm, and actually doing something real.
Cyberspace is an illusion, folks. If you think otherwise, you're heading for one helluva disappointment. Many of the people you think you're talking to don't even exist, but are only sock puppets and avatars. False projections and hollow echoes. Sure, I've owned a sock puppet or two over the years, mainly as a way to get honest reactions from people, as opposed to the shallow BS some tend to spew when they think it's "Big Bad Della" to whom they're speaking. It's the art of stalking - becoming someone or something else for a brief time to see how different the world looks through those eyes. Very eye-opening, to be sure. People say the damndest things when they believe they are talking to a sympathetic stranger - particularly when they believe that 'stranger' might be someone they can seduce into their camp.
Fascinating. I've been in chat rooms under the guise of some anonymous participant and seen myself (and most of you as well) raked over the proverbial coals by a bunch of Don Juannabes who seem to believe their opinion matters to the world at large. Beliefs and rumors are spewed forth in the guise of truth, when the reality is that it's all just a bunch of pixels in cyberspace, solid as a fart. Hot air. The rendered essence of pure bullshit. Amazing.
What I've always found interesting is that very few of those chatroom participants ever bother to even question those doing the spewing. Like zombies, they sit there and smile and nod, contented bobbleheads who seem to think they're being privvy to some inside scoop about someone else, when the reality is that the accusations and the defamations being dished out are usually filtered through a hefty dose of booze or speed or just plain old ego - the need to feel important at someone else's expense. Nothing new there, of course. I've seen fanciful accounts about how this one or that one "knows Della"... when the reality is that you only know of a stalker what a stalker wants you to know. You only see what a stalker allows you to see, and if you were truly a *seer*, you would already know that and save yourselves the embarrassment of trying to pretend you "know" me. People thought they knew Carlos, too. Though I seriously doubt anyone really did.
So, yet again, the ultimate lesson appears to be quite simple: the world is a nuthouse and the lunatics are running the asylum. To what end? you might ask. For what purpose?
Simple. It is the dictate of the foreign installation. Protect the status quo at all costs. Maintain the illusion. Service the machine.
But let's get real, people. If you're not Neo, you're Agent Smith. There's really not a lot of middle ground. You're either fighting FOR freedom, or fighting against it. You're either a warrior or a phantom. Pick one. Stand on your own two feet and stop trying to step all over mine. Be who YOU are and stop worrying about who **I** am. If that's too hard, then you need to go back to square one.
Nobody cares, of course. Life goes on. In a million years it won't make any difference. And that's a good thing.
So in December of 2009, I took a step back, did the math (took all 10 fingers but I managed), and breathed a sigh of relief to realize that the 10 year task would officially end in April of 2010. I have come to realize that Knowledge is limitless but my own patience for disseminating it isn't. I've said all I need to say on the subject - and most of it is archived here at TSW, or on my website. My own assimilation is finished - at least as much as can be accomplished through the written word, on forums, and the internet in general. The foundation which was formed during the first 44 years of my life has been tested for 10 years now, and I am pleased to realize that although it has gone through a few changes and revisions, the basic foundation has held against every onslaught, every naysayer, every heckler, every stalker, every bliss ninnie, every sock puppet, and every phantom who has held out their hand, saying, "Come with us, back to Ixtlan."
In hindsight, I have come to see that the task was the test and the test was the task. I've met some phenomenal warriors and some phenomenal phantoms. And I would like to thank each and every one of them. I mean that sincerely. Yes, even the petty tyrants and the snipers. Thank you for your role in helping me to test my foundation. But now we're finished.
Part of a warrior's task is also knowing when it is time to move forward - beyond the gaming environs, and into the unknown. Part of the task is knowing when relationships have run their course, and when it is time to release our attachments to others so as to continue our own path toward freedom. Part of the task is also learning to recognize that there are no final solutions. New clinical studies have proven there are no answers. And, that being the case, the ultimate test is knowing when to look into oneself for The Way and stop trying to place the blame or the credit on your latest guru, guidance counselor, life coach or soccer coach. You won't get where you're going by standing on the shoulders of Castaneda or anyone else. And you won't get there by grinding anyone else into the mud, either. That ain't how it's done.
I've heard it said recently that, "There are a lot of people who don't like you, Della." Good. If I were here for a popularity contest, I'd be a helluva lot more 'pleasant' and play all the games phantoms want to play. I'd talk about recipes and flowers. I'd sit in chat rooms and gossip from dawn till dusk. I'd form agreements and consensuses and upload them as convenient belief systems with no regard for their veracity. I'd be your friend and tell you you're right even when we both know you're dead wrong. I'd kiss your ass and stab you in the back with a smile. And yet, I cannot nurture your weaknesses and, in doing so, deny your strengths. If you want someone to tell you what you want to hear, ask your hooker or your dog.
I'm not a nice person and never pretended to be. I didn't come on the internet looking for friends. I came to share my story and, in the process, to test my foundation. Nothing more. Nothing less.
I cannot be who you want me to be because I can only be myself. Put another way, I cannot be lured, cajoled or hammered by phantoms on the road to Ixtlan who say, "Come play with us. All you have to do is to renounce who and what you are... come play with us..." And, yes, that very invitation was extended to me just this week. "Come play with us. Come be one of us."
Why on Earth or any other planet would I want to?
I don't WANT to be a phantom, forming agreements with other phantoms just to create and inhabit comfort zones. For at the end of that day (and the next day and that other day and the day after that), what is really accomplished? Where is the forward motion on one's own path? Where is the work on the Self when one's sole focus is rooted in agreements with strangers we've never met and never will? What is accomplished if 10 people in a cyberlounge decide to agree that Suarez is authentic and Gomez is self-righteous and Smith is a false prophet and Jesse Jackson is the second incarnation of Juan Gonzalez?
Millions of people once agreed that the flat earth was at the center of the universe. They believed it. The church sanctioned it. All the world said amen.
And none of it had anything to do with reality.
What you believe about someone or something may have no basis in reality either, but if you believe it long enough, one thing is certain: it will blind you to whatever truth lies beyond the veil of your false beliefs. But no matter. Easier to believe than to do the work required to Know. It's up to you.
Agreements. Belief systems. Comfort zones. The stock in trade of the internet. The unreal estate of PhantomHood. You protect my status quo and I'll protect yours. We'll even agree that anyone who threatens that status quo is a fraud, a liar and a charlatan... yup that's the story and we're stickin' to it.
Sorry. No.
You have to decide. Do you want to hang out on the internet pretending to do the work, or do you want to DO the work? Do you want to listen to gossip and enter into a consensus with others desperately seeking such a consensus, or do you want to open your eyes and take a look around you. Do you know who you are, or are you only an extension of those around you, a mouthpiece of the foreign installation? Who are you without your agreements?
Easy enough to shovel these words under the rug like so much dog shit. And that's exactly what they are. Heh. Like I said in the beginning, nothing of importance here. Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. Seriously. Why are you still reading? Go! Run! Death is stalking you. You don't have time for this! You don't have time to sit there planning your clever response. If you think any of this matters, go straight to jail, do not pass go, do not collect $200 - you're learned nothing. Time to get a clue, get a life, grab an afterlife, and wake up. No one can do it for you.
Someone said to me today, "Why do you care what someone else thinks of you?"
I don't. What someone THINKS about me is really not my problem. What I DO care about is when the phantoms start demanding that I deny who I am just so they can feel more comfortable. What I DO care about is when those same phantoms essentially decide that if I don't renounce my identity, they will hound and heckle until I do. After awhile, it's just plain tedious. And silly. And revealing.
I-Am. Just me.
It's pretty simple folks. If you don't like what I have to say, change the channel. If you think someone is a fraud or a saint based on what you heard in a chatroom, shame on you for not thinking for yourself. If you believe for a moment that the agreements you form in cyberspace are going to save you from the Eagle at the moment of your death... you go right on believing.
Who or what **I** am matters not one bit. If you think it does, then you are living the lie, just another Agent Smith servicing the cogs of the machine. It's who YOU are that matters. Until you see that, you do not really see.
The task is completed. My work here is done.
Believe nothing. Follow no one. Fare well.
Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Share
Freedom From the Program
Mar. 2nd, 2010 | 06:24 am
Cross-posted from THE SORCERER'S WORLD
[What follows is a dialog between Quantum Shaman and Gonzo which seems relevant. Gonzo's comments in blue, QS's comments in red. Thanks to both parties for allowing it to be posted here.]
***
Perhaps I err in assuming that anyone engaged in these spiritual pursuits has somehow become aware of the societal and familial programming to which they have been subjected. I presume if they have, then there is no issue in regard freedom that is associated with these rather banal elements. So, when I get a response in re "Freedom from what?" like the following:
...then I say the answerer is avoiding the question, since as I said, the given is we all understand this. The problem with this answer, and with others answers to this question is that the real answer is personal...it has nothing to do with the forces of society, nothing to do with gaining second attention, nothing to do with perceiving "reality", nothing to do with heightened perception. I has to do with what the person is running from...and that's personal. There is a reason why anyone seeks "freedom", or seeks "enlightenment", and the reason lies in their estimation of what they are at the moment and why they find that needing work, or change.
If you asked me "freedom from what", I would begin with what I already said in chat:
...it will always default to the lowest common denominator. IOW, the world is a nuthouse & the lunatics really ARE running the asylum. Stupidity is the LCD, so essentially the world is created BY the stupid FOR the stupid... and the rest of us must overcome that paradigm if we are to have any hope of real "freedom".
To that, I would add, in response to what you are saying in your email...
It's not a matter of just being aware of the "normal" programs. It's a far deeper awareness (clarity/seeing) of what those programs actually DO to us if we allow it. A simple one: "All things die." This is actually a command of the foreign installation - IOW, a belief system which runs so DEEP in our lives that we are virtually powerless to choose any other course of action. You may argue, "Well, D****, all things DO die," but that would only underscore the fact that you yourself are deeply absorbed into the program yourself. *shrugs* Here's why: if you are REALLY honest with yourself, you as John W**** cannot REALLY know for a fact that "all things die" because you would have to admit there are things you as John W**** simply do not and cannot know without direct personal knowledge. To your current PERCEPTION, it appears that "all things die", but what if (just what if...) tales of the tenant are true, or there are other immortals walking the earth? How would YOU know?
Answer... you wouldn't and you couldn't IF YOU ARE ALREADY OF THE MINDSET WHICH SAYS "ALL THINGS DIE." You would never even CONSIDER the possibility because you already BELIEVE you know the answer... so you aren't really "free" in that case, but are actually the victim of the program which tells you WHAT to believe. THAT is the foreign installation - it is the shit put onto you not just in terms of social/cultural programs, but right down to the molecular level at which you EXIST.
When I talk about wanting freedom from "the programs" THAT is what I'm referring to: freedom from the AUTOMATIC and often INVISIBLE effects of some of these deeper programs. The social/cultural programs are only the tip of the iceberg. Beneath/beyond those programs you start getting into the more "sinister" programming such as "all things die" or "women are inherently inferior" or "homosexuality is abberent" and so on and on and on. While some of these may appear to be "social/cultural" programs, my observation after all these years on the path is that at least SOME of those programs are in place to PROTECT the status quo of the lowest common denominator, rather than encourating/enabling folks to to BEYOND the program.
So... freedom from WHAT? Simply what I've said above. It's not just "the program", it's the paradigms and sub-programs which "the program" creates in each individual, and in the culture/society as a whole.
How might our experience of life be different if we did not have the program "all things die" fed to us while we are still in the womb? What might we be CAPABLE of if we were not "dumbed down" to the lowest common denominator of human ignorance? A real and true PROGRAM is not just something the computer "believes". It is essentially what the computer IS... until the program crashes, is made to crash, or replaced by an upgrade.
I'm looking for freedom from the low-end software.
And I would add that the "problem" we face (those who would say they are seeking freedom) is that the collective is perhaps 6 billion strong, whereas each individual is a force of One. So... the gravity of the situation is rather obvious.
Because of how you have presented this notion, there is no way to respond since any response not in agreement would be deemed as result of the foreign installation and proof of its existence.
Normally when someone attempts to derail the idea of freedom, it is PRECISELY because they are hooked into the foreign installation. *shrugs* Not a judgment, just an observation based on things you've said all along, and particularly what you are saying in this current convo. In arguing for status quo (which is what you're doing), you are indicating that you have "surrendered" to the current paradigm. Imagine how our world would be different had everyone throughout history done the same. We would still live in caves or grass huts at best, women would be bed slaves whelping out children, and we would all believe in some version of a god - because those are all the lowest common denominators of human existence. Sorry... we are capable of better, and it is only in striving to our HIGHEST potential that we move beyond that LOWEST common denominator.
I'm going to respond anyway, if for no other reason than to clarify my own notions for myself. My preference is to see and to accept things as they are. I see no reason either to challenge or to change the current paradigm.
That alone is evidence of surrender to the FI, imo. No, not some alien entity. Just the status quo. It is only when the paradigm itself evolves that people (individuals or civilizations) are enabled to seek BEYOND their current limitations. Put another way: argue for your limitations, and they are yours. Isn't that what you're doing?
As with the world and humanity at large, it requires no fixing. In effect, your proposition as with others of its kind aims really to attempt to create some sort of a Nirvana, a situation of constant heightened awareness, perhaps even a K-pax style of being where there are no rules, or laws, because they aren't needed.
Frankly, I couldn't care less about paradise or Nirvana, rules or laws. What I care about personally is freedom from the limitations which are automatically imposed by the simple existence of the FI. In the mid-70s, I actually pre-qualified for the astronaut program, but when it was discovered that I had a cunt instead of a prick, I was immediately disqualified and told I could only fly prop planes. Not jets. Couldn't be a combat pilot. Could only... blah blah blah... and the usual rhetoric reserved for those with cunts. It was the height of insult and dismissal, since my qualifications were in the top 2% of the nation. So it wasn't my ABILITY that prevented me from doing what I wanted to do. It was my anatomy. And WHY was it my anatomy? Because the FI dictated at that time that women were inferior to men and... yada yada yada... the rest is history.
Had I been smarter throughout my "writing career" (makes me gag at this point), I would have used the alternym, "David Alexander," because I recently read an article wherein it was PROVEN that the same book submitted under a male name or a female name will have a 95% BETTER chance of selling if it is from a male author. 95%. What does that say to you about the FI. We're talking about the EXACT same manuscript... the EXACT same words... but the difference between "David" or "Debbie" determines what sells, not whether or not the book is any goddamn good.
These little facts are part of the status quo you seem determined to protect when you say "it requires no fixing." Maybe you're right in the so-called "big picture", but only in the sense that it's up to every human being to find a way AROUND the FI or a way to be BEYOND the FI (ergo... freedom from the FI), but in the experience of everyday life, the FI is frankly designed to "protect" people who support its old-boy structure, and to oppress and suppress those who see it for what it is (an old-boys club of the nth degree).
So, maybe you think you have no reason to change it - but it isn't about Nirvana. It's not even about "fairness" because this world will never be fair, or anywhere close to it. It's simply about freedom from it ALTOGETHER. And the only way I have found to achieve that is the keen awareness of it, and the absolute refusal to play in its paradigm. Problem is, while still in humanform, we are subjected to it at one level or another by default - so the concept of freedom is also one that lies in the distance, beyond the horizon of current affairs and the old boys paradigm. Can it be achieved? Sure. I've done it and so have others. But if we're completely honest, we have to admit that "it" is still always out there, and since it is an all-pervasive force which exists on the human bandwidth/frequency, it is always automatically seeking/searching in an attempt to hook us back in. Put another way: even when we turn off the radio (the FI), the radio waves themselves are still in the air, all around us. So it is a constant battle to remain awake and aware and not get lullabyed back into the comforting arms of the happy status quo.
Add to that the notion of immortality. In all of those scenarios what is at the basis of them is a condemnation of how things are at the moment...all the cruelty, all the pain, all the death, all the injustice, all the hate, etc etc etc.
It's far more than that. It's not just the "bad" stuff, it's also the expectations put onto humans by the paradigm that has so fucked them up. We're all supposta look like Hollywood movie stars, so women starve themselves half to death, wear clothes that make them look like hookers, and surgically carve their bodies into all sorts of bizarre manifestations because the FI tells them they are worthless otherwise. If you're over 30, you're "over the hill"... the programs there are endless. The men live in a constant state of feeling inadequate because they aren't getting enough pussy to qualify as an "alpha male", and they don't look like Brad Pitt or Tom Cruise, so they end up feeling resentful toward the women who won't give them a second look... and ALL of this is not because of nature, but because we have been PROGRAMMED by the FI to think that only a narrow range of attributes is considered "desirable", while the rest of humanity is dismissed as ugly, lazy, slothful, and so on. That's simply NOT our nature. We are just human beings with a wide range of physical, mental and spiritual attributes - but because the FI has programmed us to think we MUST be a certain way in order to be "acceptable", most spend their lives in a state of fear and misery - believing they are not "good enough." That alone is a full-time occupation (and distraction) for most.
Yes, freedom from THAT would be good as well. Personally, I no longer have the insecurity issues, but many do, and I mention it as a good way to illustrate WHY the FI is not yer friend, despite what you may think. You can defend it all you like, saying it's just a paradigm through which a society protects itself; but it is a hideous bit of software that has nothing to do with our well-being, and everything to do with the generation and maintenance of insecurity, fear, pain, and emotional anguish.
Why? For as long as humans (individuals or societies as a whole) are held in this type of emotional/mental/spiritual bondage, they simply have no will to challenge the FI itself, and so the status quo is maintained. What would be the purpose of that? Simply put, the universe appears to be designed in such a way that evolution is a natural part of our progress, but so are obstacles which stand in the way of that evolution. So, when I say I want freedom from the FI... I have no delusions that I am going to bring it to the ground and open up a brave new world of condos for bliss ninnies, or anything of the sort. I'm not here to save the world. Couldn't care less. I'm here to save myself - and the first step toward doing that is to PERSONALLY shake off the programs which are intrinsic to the FI.
In an obscure Geo C Scott movie titled "They Might be Giants", he addresses a crowd of street people beneath a bridge on the Hudson surrounded by trash and he says to them, "THIS is Paradise."
That's Hollywood. And it's also the voice of the FI. "Come with us to Ixtlan." Thanks, I'll pass.
So, we differ actually on basics. I'm drawn to Zen because in essence it promotes the acceptance of things as they are, not as we might wish them to be.
Keep in mind that Zen comes from a culture where people were repressed and beaten down by warlords and the like, for centuries. That being the case, they no doubt HAD to learn to accept things "as they are" and so their philosophy would reflect their environment, just as the current US "philosophy" reflects our environment - i.e., the current generation is "The Generation of Entitlement", and the philosophy seems to be one which states the world owes them something. Philosophy reflects environment. Not always a good thing, in other words. I'm not going to get into an argument w/ you about Zen. Heh. I'm simply pointing out that NO philosophy is the be-all, end-all, including Zen, Toltec or any other. All philosophies (every one of them) are about learning to cope with or somehow subvert the dominant paradigm. Zen is about acceptance. Toltec is more about subversion - not on any grand scale, but at the level of the individual. Both are only guidelines, road maps. So when we talk about "freedom from the foreign installation", it's essentially a freedom from ALL philosophy. The good, the bad, the ugly. ALL of it - and it will come down to one thing: create your own reality, or be crushed under someone else's.
I'm drawn to notions expressed in The Michael Book in regard the purpose of human existence. I'm drawn too, to notions expressed in "Illusions", things like, "The depth of your ignorance may be measured by your belief in injustice and tragedy." And I'm drawn to what Robert Monroe wrote about, further adding to notions from the Michael book, further adding to a purpose for existing, as well as a purpose for experiencing being human, and a purpose for experiencing death.
All fine and good. But I'm not going to accept on someone else's word (not yours, Monroe's, Buddha's or Christ's) that there is a 'purpose for experiencing death'. Again, that's just the voice of the FI, programming us to accept ITS paradigm, when we are perfectly capable of creating our own. Death may be "natural". Or not. It was once a fact that the natural lifespan was less than 35 years. As a species, we essentially knocked that paradigm out of the water. We live a bit longer now because we CHOSE to kick the existing paradigm in the nut sack. The earth was once flat, too, as you may recall.
That's what the whole warrior schtick is about - kicking the FI in the nuts and saying no to Big Brother - which is really just an extension of the hive mind, the gnattering and chattering internal dialog of the lowest common denominator of our humanness. I don't see any boogeymen out there, though I'm sure others would disagree. All I really *see* is that our thoughts are made of energy, and that energy can take on a life of its own - and has done so in the form of the foreign installation. The "baddies" are us - not just 5-6 billion strong (earth's current population), but the combined strength of every human being who has ever lived on the planet. It is the combined belief systems and self-limiting bullshit which has been thrown into the pot since the first caveman crawled out of the primordial stew and got eaten by whatever was in the habit of eating cavemen. Grogg-zugg may be dead, but the energy of his fears lives on in the energetic matrix of the FI itself.
THAT is what we're struggling to overcome.
Maybe all things do die, but I rather doubt that. It appears to me to be just one more extension of the foreign installation - because when humans can be limited to a very finite lifespan, their chance of disturbing the larger status quo is minimalized. So... when we can be programmed to believe "all things die", chances are we become far more humble in the face of our mortality, and subservient to the machine which promises to "save" us (whether in the form of medical intervention or spiritual salvation), while at the same time reminding us that we are beings who are going to die (and don't you forget it!). Maybe true. But... what if it isn't? What if tales of the tenant are true? What if immortality is just as real as mortality, but our programming doesn't allow us to see it? If we don't ask the questions, if we just blindly accept our "fate," we have already bowed down before the FI and bared our throat to the executioner. Sorry... not my way.
I function from this basis, and when therefore I ask someone what they want freedom from, I suspect it is freedom from the current paradigm, freedom from the bad and painful, and above all, freedom from death. So, in that regard, I hear what you're saying. That corresponds with your basic notions....it does not correspond with mine.
That's fair, but have you asked yourself - REALLY asked yourself - where your notions come from? Why is it seemingly so easy for you to argue for accepting "what is" when it is plain to see that none of it is real, but simply an extension of the program itself? People aren't real - ergo the comment "phantoms on the road to Ixtlan." Do you really know what Genaro meant by that? Phantoms aren't ghosts or zombies or some sort of boogeymen. They are simply people who have gone back to sleep (or never woke up to begin with), and are the happy servants of the foreign installation itself. If you aren't at war with the machine, or actively seeking freedom from it, you are in league with it. There is no middle ground in my opinion.
Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Share
The Quitter
Jan. 3rd, 2010 | 11:45 am
Interesting question, which sheds considerable light on the questioner's perspective.
What must be acknowledged at some point is that all paths - including this one - run the high risk of dead-ending into madhouses where the inmates, long-starved, will tear away at anything and anyone within their reach.
Knowing we cannot cure the madmen, knowing we cannot even slake their thirst, is the first step toward the true goal of the path.
Freedom.
Why did I quit?
To be free of the madness.
...and also... keep in mind that believing someone else has "quit" may only reveal your own limited perceptions and your own self-importance - implying abandonment. What I do elsewhere on the net... remains within my silence. What I do elsewhere in the real world... remains within my experience.
Be free.
Even if it means slaughtering the madmen and burning the madhouse to the ground.
Be. Free.

Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Share
Transcendence: Long-term commitment
Dec. 26th, 2009 | 10:59 am
Things to consider, in no particular order, as we contemplate transcendence...
Most often, any long term process can only be viewed in hindsight, when one looks back over the bridge to see how the bridge was built. As I have told Della, you have to be immortal before you will know how to become immortal. What does that look like? Simply this: only after you have opened your eyes inside the double will the double be sufficiently real for you to begin creating it in the first place. Only when you have identified your desire will you be sufficiently motivated to manifest it.
Most important: there is an intuitive drive within each warrior that will determine the steps s/he takes with regard to her own path. If your predilection is to seek immortality, you can use that predilection as the driving force to determine the position of the assemblage point. Put another way, what you desire may be used with ruthless intent to manifest not only the 'object' of the desire, but to maintain the desire itself so that it does not go stale and lose itself in the process. If asked to bring this down into a more practical application, I would tell you this: seek what it is in your nature to seek and you will usually find it, or - more importantly - you will create it in the process of searching for it. Neo was not The One until he had reason to be The One.
This, too, is the essence of transcendence. Do not waste time seeking transcendence if you do not desire it. Do not waste energy pursuing things you THINK you should want, but may not want at all. What do YOU want? Of what do YOU Dream?
Is it a meditation or not-doing? That would depend on your predilection. I cannot tell you what to desire, nor how to desire it. What I can tell you is IF you desire transcendence or transmogrification, meditation and not-doing may serve as tools through which 'the way' reveals itself to you.
It has been said that spiritual matters cannot be 'reasoned out'. This is both true and untrue, but mostly it is a dangerous generalization. If you do not apply the energetic probe of thought to a question, it is possible (though not likely) that you may stumble over the answer somewhere down the road, but it leaves much to chance to assume that would be the case. And while it is also true that there may be no direct path to any direct answer, I have found it effective to focus on the question regularly and diligently so as to create a pathway for the answer to manifest. Put another way: think on the question but do not attempt to force an answer, while at the same time remaining open to the likely possibility that the answer will come only when you are not looking for it, and usually in ways that have no direct relation to the question itself.
Bollocks. Sandstorms. Cats with silver whiskers. Owlsong.
If you desire transcendence, focus your questions there - it is the artform of rubbing the energy of your intent against the fabric of the universe.
Transcendence: It begins with a thought. It continues with eliminating the programs which tell you it is not possible. It is accomplished by the literal transformation of desire into manifestation.
The Wright Brothers dreamed of flying.
Of what is your airplane made and how will you build it?
It begins with a thought...
Orlando
December 26, 2009
Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Share
Addictions & Indulgences: A Channeling
Dec. 24th, 2009 | 09:59 am
_____________
The only real difference between an addiction and an indulgence is that there is usually no difference at all. An indulgence, when indulged, quickly turns to addiction. And an addiction is nothing more than an indulgence which is given free reign and often self-excused by the social and cultural program which tries to tell you it's a dis-ease of the organic form, when in actuality it is an imbalance of spirit.
From that perspective, it is possible to realize that any indulgence begins with a thought, and all indulgences may be cured instantaneously with a thought - if (and only if) that is the intent of the warrior. I am not telling you to be strong. I am telling you, simply, to be real with yourself. For the first thing you must do is identify what it is you are gaining from your indulgences/addictions, and what they may be taking from you while they remain attached to you in the form of energetic hooks which come, ultimately, from yourself.
What does this indulgence give you? Is it a sense of belonging, or emotional security, or sexual possibilities, or the lure or undying love? Those, of course, are the simple answers. The more complex possibilities might include the notion that these indulgences may provide you with a distraction from something else, and so it is easier to surrender mind, body & spirit to the indulgence than it is to turn and face the real work of your path which still needs to be addressed - even if that work may be nothing more than learning to overcome boredom.
What does this indulgence take from you? If you examine it carefully, you will usually find that all indulgences are energy vampires to one extent or another, and the most common commodity an indulgence steals is Time itself - which is the most precious and least predictable ally a warrior has. Lose yourself too long in the fantasies of your indulgences, you may wake up to discover the muse has left you and the double has dissipated into the nothingness from which it was originally called into being.
It has been said that a man may not serve two masters, and that is especially true with warriors. Lose sight of your intent and the addictions and indulgences will eat away at you while often providing the false illusion of security or even happiness. And yet, for a warrior the state of 'happiness' is highly overrated and vastly misunderstood. The happiest men I've ever known are those so wrapped in their indulgences that they have lost sight of the path altogether, while steadfastly maintaining that they are warriors on the road to freedom. They will tell you from the bottom of a bottle of their addiction that they are choosing the indulgence with awareness, and that it is their path and their predilection to engage an addictive personality. They will say it is a dis-ease and they are therefore blameless victims of circumstance.
And yet, to one with clarity, this is not the voice of the warrior, but the voice of the indulgence, having taken on form and personality of its own. This is the demon personified and manifested - not as some extant creature to be engaged in battle, but as a virus which consumes the self until all that remains is a hollow echo of what might have been.
You have stated that this woman became an indulgence and an addiction, and that perhaps she was an ally, not even human. IF that is the case, then you must ask yourself what the ally is attempting to reveal to you. Clearly, she would have no need to demonstrate her own power, for what would be the purpose? Allies have no reason to debilitate humans, although it is a certainty that humans may allow themselves to be debilitated by an ally - and if that is the case it is of paramount importance that you examine that crossroad moment when you succumbed to the seduction and lost sight of the goal.
It is my perception that this 'woman' is far more than you think, but only when you overcome the addiction will you be able to comprehend the events which have transpired to bring you to this point. And only from that point will you be able to wrestle with the ally and determine the course of your path.
The danger is this: for as long as you allow the addiction to hold you in stasis, you are not in control of your own destiny.
What to do? I believe you already know.
_____________
Follow-up
It is recognized by sorcerers that an obsession is rather like a gift which may be seen in hindsight as a gift of kindness or a gift of madness. The object itself is the same in either case. The knife may be used to cut away dis-eased tissue, or may be used to cut one's own wrists; and in either case it is the intent of the warrior that will determine the outcome. In the same manner, a box of sugar cubes may be used to sweeten one's tea over the period of a year, or may be eaten all at once until one is lethargic and sick. Intent determines.
In Greek history, those who became possessed by spirits or allies or the essence of the lamia became prophets or madmen, depending on the manifestation of their own intent. The prophet would use the energy of his obsession to propel himself into heightened awareness, and from there, to further project himself into unfathomable realms of silent knowing. The madman, on the other hand, would be seduced by the obsession and sink deeper and ever deeper into its embrace until all that remains in the dark cave at the core is the consumed-self, devoid of all gnosis and no longer cohesive except as a false echo of some past memory of himself, a victim of the stranglehold of the obsession itself.
The phenomenal aspect of this is that the person will appear on the surface to be no different. But to one who sees, the energetic matrix of self has become fragmented and no longer bears any resemblance to its original manifestation. I knew a man once who said his wife had become a stranger since becoming unnaturally possessed with her role of mother to their two children. Though they took their meals together and slept in the same bed and spoke of the same things they had always spoken of, she was absent in spirit. As I had not seen the man's wife in many years, I went to visit with them, only to realize upon my arrival that I did not know this woman at all. She wore the same face of the woman I had once known, but there was no familiarity even when we embraced as old friends. Her children had grown up and moved from their home. Her eyes had turned hollow and dark and all love had gone from her. She had become a phantom with no hope of redemption, for the aspect of herself that might have redeemed her had been consumed.
Indulgences and addictions are not unlike the razor's edge between creation and destruction. When used with unbending intent, they may serve as a powerful tool of motivation, inspiration, self-creation. When allowed to possess the spirit utterly, they are little more than a premature and lingering death, even if comfortable and pleasant.
Intent determines.
-Orlando - August 28, 2009
All material in this blog (essays, rants, images, poetry, et al) is copyright © by Della Van Hise, and may not be reprinted elsewhere without the prior written permission of the author. Quantum ShamanTM is a trademark of QuantumShaman.ComTM and reserves all rights




